Confused UK: Parents could be punished for preventing transgender children by Tony Ademiluyi

Share this post:


Pundits recall the arrogance that former British Prime Minister, David Cameron displayed when he didn’t hide his sinister and asinine agenda to export ‘same-sex marriage’ globally. As a straight ally, he ensured to protect the ‘rights’ of the LGBTQ community and ensure that they get a better deal in society.

The chickens have now come home to roost as parents can now be prosecuted and even be sent behind bars for denying their children the ‘right’ to transition from one sex to the other.

WND News Centre reports that an expert on the law who multiple times has testified before Congress on various legal disputes says the United Kingdom is going to extremes now, making it abuse NOT to abuse a child.

It is Jonathan Turley, of George Washington University, who has written a column about what the government there is demanding of parents when their children say they are transgender.

He said there’s an interpretation put forward by police in the U.K. which provides that “parents who refuse to use the alternative pronouns for their children or refuse to pay for their transitioning could be criminally prosecuted.”

Those transitioning “treatments” would include the administration of chemicals to sterilize a child for life and even surgical body mutilations.

“As the debate rages in the United States over parental notification and authority in cases involving transgender children, the United Kingdom is embroiled in a controversy over a law that would not only limit parental authority in such cases but affirmatively require parents to pay for such transitioning,” he explained.

He noted, “According to the U.K.’s Code for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), abusive conduct now includes ‘withholding money for transitioning [and] refusing to use their preferred name or pronoun.’ So a parent with familial or religious objections to the transitioning of a child would be required under the law to fund operations or treatments.”

He explained, “To potentially prosecute a parent for refusing to use an adopted pronoun of their child is chilling and wrong. Nevertheless, a CPS spokesperson doubled down with a comment to Fox News that ‘domestic abuse is a severe crime and leaves victims with a lasting impact. … This assists prosecutors to ensure that any victim, regardless of who they are, can get justice for the abuse they have faced.’”

Turley said, “It was Sir Edward Coke in ‘The Institutes of the Laws of England,’ 1628 who declared ‘For a man’s house is his castle, et domus sua cuique est tutissimum refugium [and each man’s home is his safest refuge].’ William Pitt, the first Earl of Chatham later added: ‘The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the crown. It may be frail – its roof may shake – the wind may blow through it – the storm may enter – the rain may enter – but the King of England cannot enter.”

The idea, actually, isn’t new there.

That would make a parent who declines to affirm transgender ideology adopted by his or her child guilty of abuse.

Lawmakers in the state have adopted AB 957. Originally, it demanded courts consider whether a child’s parents were “gender-affirming” in custody cases.

But that was amended to re-invent the state’s entire standard for child care.

It was written to make sure that every parent of a transgender child affirm that lifestyle choice.

The Daily Caller News Foundation reported, “California courts would be given complete authority under Section 3011 of California’s Family Code to remove a child from his or her parents’ home if parents disapprove of LGBTQ+ ideology.”

Leftist pursuing that ideology in California simply decided to change the definition of what makes up the “health, safety, and welfare of [a] child.”

The report said, “In essence, a boy could report his parents to his local school’s Gay-Straight Alliance club or other LGBTQ+ organization, who could then report the boy’s parents for child abuse.

This is a grave violation of the rights of parents to adequately discipline their children when they step out of line.

This is the hocus pocus that the gay lobby wants to export to Africa to cause needless confusion in the continent and add to our plethora of challenges part of them had their imprimatur in the first place.

This report must be taken very seriously and Conservative MPs must ensure that this doesn’t become law as it will be extremely chaotic. Think about the immigrants that flock to the UK especially the black minority ethnic groups from Africa with a long history of child discipline! The jails will be filled with black parents with deleterious consequences for their offspring who will be indoctrinated with the LGBTQ ideology in government-approved foster care homes or with liberal foster parents.

The UK will be worse off for it and it may herald the sun setting of the once globally acclaimed British Empire.

Tony Ademiluyi is the Director, Media & Publicity West Africa for West African Christian Voice Trumpet Call Ministry  and is a contributing writer for the Project for Human Development. He can be reached at +2348167677075 and

Support Project for Human Development’s Pro-Life Media Agenda

It is no news that most African nations have bravely pushed back against the liberal agenda of the West to foist the destructive agenda on hitherto Sovereign African nations through their local legislatures.

What is unknown to most Africans is the surreptitious hijacking of the soul of the African media to aggressively push this nauseating culture of death preying on the ignorance of many Africans on noble pro-life issues.

It is therefore imperative for African Conservatives/Pro-Lifers to control the media space and positively use it to shape local public opinion.

If you want genuine sustainable development in Africa which can only occur with the pro-life ideology, consider making a generous donation to 0042779816 Project for Human Development, Access Bank.